|
Effects of Overfishing on Marine BioDiversity
by Mercedes Lee and Carl Safina
"The last fallen mahogany would lie perceptibly on the
landscape, and the last black rhino would be obvious in
its loneliness, but a marine species may disappear
beneath the waves unobserved and the sea will seem to
roll on the same as always." (Ray, p. 45)
Overfishing occurs when fish are being caught
faster than they can reproduce and replace
themselves. Overfishing can affect biological
diversity. Biodiversity is the diversity of living things,
and can be thought of as occurring on three levels:
genetic, species, and ecosystem. Genetic diversity is
the genetic variability that occurs among members of
the same species. Species diversity is the variety of
species found in a community or ecosystem. And
ecological diversity is the variety of types of biological
communities. An additional means of categorizing
biological diversity is functional diversity; the variety
of biological processes characteristic of a particular
ecosystem. These units of diversity are interrelated.
As Thome-Miller and Catena explain,
"In the face of environmental change, the loss of
genetic diversity weakens a population's ability to
adapt; the loss of species diversity weakens a
community's ability to adapt; the loss of functional
diversity weakens an ecosystem's ability to adapt; and
the loss of ecological diversity weakens the whole
biosphere's ability to adapt. Because biological and
physical processes are interactive, losses o biological
diversity may also precipitate further envi- change.
This progressively destructive routine results in
impoverished biological systems, which are
susceptible to collapse when faced with further
environmental changes." (Thorn-Miller and Catena,
1991, p. 10)
Genetic Diversity
Genes are the material that codify the characteristics
and functions contained within an organism. Genetic
diversity enables a species to persist in the face of
environmental changes that occur naturally If a
species population is large or dispersed over different
geographic areas, it is virtually assured of having
abundant genetic variation. Abundant genetic variawithin a species "'increases its potential for
successfully evolving in response to long-term envichanges" (Ehrlich, 1988, p. 24).
Selection pressures, whether natural (such as
predation and competition for food) or human-related
(such as fishing), can shape the heritable adaptations
of a species and thus alter its characteristics over
time. Fishing mortality can be a form of environmentchange that selects for and alters certain physical and
developmental characteristics of a population of
marine animals. In other words, fishing activities can
cause evolution.
The frequency of occurrence of certain genes in a
fish population can be altered by overfishing in two
ways: if fishing activity applies a selective pressure;
and if the fishing activity applies a random pressure
so great that the population is driven low enough to
reduce genetic variability.
Heavy fishing pressure can change the genetic
characteristics of a population by selecting for or
against certain genetically heritable traits like size at
first sexual maturity (Policansky, 1993). This can
happen, for example, when the larger fish in a
population are selectively overexploited. Removing
the larger fish over time results in favoring the
survival of smaller fish which mature at an earlier-
than-average age or smaller-than-average size. If
heavy fishing removes most fish early in their
reproductive life, individuals that mature younger or
smaller than average are at an evolutionary
advantage: the fish that survive and do more of the
reproducing (e.g., the smaller-at- ones) are able to
pass on their genes to future generations. The genetic
variability of the population is changed from its former
state to now containing a larger proportion of
individuals that are genetically encoded to begin
reproducing at a smaller size and/or younger age.
Fishing can in this way inadvertently exert a pressure to selectively breed toward miniaturization or early maturation.
Sharks are more susceptible to overexploitation than otherfish because they have a low reproductive potential and grow
very slowly. They can be quite large and old (in some cases thirty years old) before they spawnfor the first time. In some
areas, commercial fishermen have removed whole schools of sharks-such as scalloped hammerhead sharb--severely reduclocal populations, such as in the Sea of Cortez and the Galapagos Islands. Because sharks are at the top of thefood web,
their depletion can have cascading effects on the whole ecosystem.
Fishing pressure selecting for smaller-sized fish can
be found in the case of Pacific pink salmon. Over
time, with about 80 percent of the spawning fish being
caught, catch data registered a decrease in the
average weight per fish. After evaluating and
accounting for other factors, such as environmental
causes, researchers concluded that fishing pressure
was the cause in miniaturization of the pink salmon
(Law, 1991).
Fishing activities could also apply a pressure so great
that the population goes low enough to lose genetic
variability simply because there are not enough
individuals in the gene pool to carry the full range of
variability that once comprised the population. Genetic
changes within a population undergoing intense fishing
pressure can be measured within as little as ten
years. An example is the orange oughy a fish which
does not mature until it is 20 years old, and can live as
long as 50 years. A large spawning aggregation was
found off New Zealand in the early 1980s. After ten
years of heavy commercial fishing of adults, the total
biomass of orange roughy declined 60-70 percent.
Genetic studies revealed that genetic diversity within
the orange rughy population decreased significantly
during this time period (Smith, et al., 1991).
One example of overfishing having induced early
maturation in a population can be found in the
Northeast Arctic cod. In this case, the trawling
practiced was indiscriminate, intensively exploiting all
age-classes of the cod. Fishing of Arcto-Norwegian
cod on their feeding grounds since the onset of
trawlmg in the 1930s gradually caused the breeding
stock to become younger overall (Sutherland, 1990).
A "large change in mortality imposed by fishing genera big selection pressure for early maturation
irrespective of any change in size-at-age" (Law,
1991, p. 36). Between the 1930s and 1950s, the fish
were known to mature between the ages of nine and
11, and "immature individuals had roughly a 40
percent chance of surviving from age 3 to 8 years"
(Law, 1991). Overall mortality was increased by this
fishing pressure to such a level that it significantly
reduced the chances of the breeding-age cod
reaching their spawning grounds to two percent. As a
result, remaining faster-growing cod entered the
breeding stock, and as such, "there has been A
gradual shift toward earlier maturation" (Sutherland,
1990, p. 814). The cod now mature when they are
about seven or eight years old.
Species Diversity
Species richness, that is the numbers of species per
area, and the pattern of their distribution under
normal stresses, is used to assess species diversity. (Thome-Miller and Catena 1991).
Fishing-related activities can in some cases actually
add species to a given ecosystem. There are
numerous examples of fish introduced to natural
waterways for food or recreation, or accidental
introductions of fouling organisms, symbionts, and
diseases associated with transfer of creatures for
aquacultural activities. Shellfish are the basis of many
introductions to marine environments for commercial
cultivation. Many times, these, and other
introductions, have negative consequences for native
organisms.
For example, the Japanese oyster was introduced to
help boost British Columbia's declining commercial
shellfish fishery, which had been based on the native
Olympia oyster. Competition from the Japanese
oyster and other introduced species exacerbated the
decline of the Olympia oyster. While the native oyster
is still extant, it can no longer be considered
ecologically functional, and the shellfish industry there
is now based on the introduced species (Lipton et al.,
1991). Overexploitation and introductions have also
been a source of severe problems for the sole native
oyster species of France, the European oyster. In
1979, a disease from cultivated oyster stocks of the
European oyster in Washington was inadvertently
introduced to France's native oyster population
(Lipton, et al., 1991). The persistence of this disease
has undermined subsequent oyster introductions of
various species as well - It is not known whether any
original stocks of the European oyster continue to
exist in the waters off France.
Overfishing can deplete biological diversity by causing
extinctions. While no marine species is known to have
gone extinct due solely to fishing, the Atlantic gray
whale was hunted to extinction, and other marine
marnmals were placed close to extinction by
overexploitation. For example, between 1920 and
1986, the population of humpback whale was reduced
to five percent of its former level (Butman, et al.,
1993). Several fish species are being reduced to very
low levels by fishing, especially species that have
concurrent habitat problems, such as many sturgeons,
several North American salmon stocks, and the
totoaba of the Gulf of California, suggesting
biological extinction may become a possibility.
Overfishing can affect biological diversity by reducing
species richness. When an animal's population is
depressed to such low levels that the species no
longer fulfills its role as prey, predator, or competitor
in the ecosystem, it has essentially become ecologi- or
functionally extinct. This can have the effect
of relaxing competition or predation, allowing other
species to become more dominant in the ecosystem.
This affects the naturally-evolved numerical and
functional relationships-which may becalled the
ecological integrity--among species in a community.
Overfishing of wrasses and triggerfishes off the
coasts of Haiti, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Hainan
Island, China, provide an example of how
overexploitation can disrupt predator-prey
relationships. Wrasses and triggerfishes feed on sea
urchins. Overexploitation of these wrasse and
triggerfish populations resulted in sea urchins
reproducing unchecked. As sea urchins are
herbivores dependent on algae as a major food
source, the increased population of urchins over-
grazed the areas' seagrass beds to the point of
obliteration (Norse, 1993). Somewhat conversely,
removal of most herbivorous reef fish from some
Caribbean coral reefs appears to have had
consequences during a natural die-off of algae-eating
urchins there. With the urchins reduced to very low
levels and few herbivorous fish to compensate for
their absence, algae overgrew corals, causing
largescale mortality, with consequences for the coral-
dependent community (Robertson, 1991).
The effects of overfishing on humans, as top
predators, is a good indicator, on a qualitative level, of
when the richness of species is diminished and a
biological community becomes changed. For
example, as much as ten pounds of unwanted
creatures are killed for every pound of shrimp caught
in the southern U.S. This bycatch, according to the
President's Council on Environmental Quality, has
contributed over the last 20 years to an 85 percent
decline in the Gulf of Mexico population of bottom
fishes like snappers and groupers-which themselves
support commercial fisheries. Some people who once
fished for adult snappers in the Gulf have been
forced to fish for other species or driven out of the
fishing business altogether. Georges Bank once
supported one of the richest cod and haddock
fisheries in the world. However, decades of
overfishing drove these groundfish to such low
populations that spiny dogfish and skates now
dominate the ecosystem. This ecological shift may
well be permanent, as the recovery of cod and other
groundfish populations may not be possible if they
are unable to successfully compete with the piny
dogfish, skates, and other opportunistic species
to regain their ecological niche.
As groundfish such as cod, yellowtail flounder, and haddock were being overfished in the Atlantic Grand Banks, spiny
dogfish and skates have moved in, perhaps permanently rearranging the system.
Fisheries managers are now discussing the possibility of
redirecting the overcapitalized fishing fleet to target the
now-dominant dogfish and skates; but uncertainty remains
as to whether sufficient markets can be found for these
species which were once considered "trash" fish.
Ironically, humans suffer the major effects of overfishing
long before the animals themselves completely vanish.
Ecosystem Diversity
Analagous to species diversity, the number of ecosystems
and pattern of their distribution can be used as a measure
of ecosystem diversity. While we know of no examples
where fishing activities eliminated an ecosystem, there are
several examples where fishing activities have resulted in
major reduction in the regional distribution of ecosystem types
over large areas.
Mariculture--the farming of economically valuable sea life--is
a fishing activity that has significantly altered coastal and
estuarine habitats in many parts of the world. Along the
coasts of Ecuador and Thailand, for example, fish farms
have replaced mangrove habitats over fairly extensive
areas. In order to build aquaculture facilities to raise
shrimp and fish, mangroves are dug out and replaced with
ponds, eliminating essential nursery habitat for many
fishes. While mangrove ecosystems have not disappeared
on a global scale, on a regional level there have been
significant reductions in the total area of mangroves, a
form of ecosystem depletion.
Conclusion
The dance of life operates in diverse, strange, and
mysterious ways. Understanding the biological processes
influencing the functional relationships of marine
organisms, species, and whole communities has practical
implications for understanding the consequence of human
actions. As a species reliant on the biological productivity
of oceans, in order to optimize the benefits humans can
gain from this vessel of life, we need to know how to
minimize the negative consequences of our actions for
other living things, and for future generations.
Even with better understanding of the human factors
influencing marine biological diversity, fisheries
management is inevitably a matter of politics, not science. Management will not succeed in preservi 9
Mercedes Lee has been a writer and science editor for
National Audubon Society for the last 10 years. She
is currently outreach coordinator for Audubon's
Living Oceans Program. Carl Safina is senior
ecologist at National Audubon Society, and director
of the Living Oceans Program.
References
Butman, C.A., J.T Carlton, and S.R. Palumbi. 1995.
"Whaling Effects on Deep-Sea Biodiversity,"
Conservation Biology. 9:462-464.
Ehrich, P 1988. "The Loss of Diversity: Causes and
Consequences," pp. 21-27, in E.O. Wilson, ed.,
Biodiversity Academic Press, New York.
Knowlton, N. 1992. "Thresholds and Multiple Stable States
in Coral Reef Community Dynamics," Amer. Zool. 32:674-
682.
Lipton, D., E. Lavan, and I. Strand. 199 1. Economics of
Mollusk Introductions and Transfers: The Chesapeake
Dilemma," paper presented at the 1990 Annual meeting of
the North American Shellfish Association. (updated 1991).
Law, R. 1991. "Fishing in evolutionary waters," New
Scientist. 2 March:35-37
Robertson, D.R. 1991. "Increases in surgeonfish pop
ulations after mass mortality of the sea urchirn Diadema
antillarum in Panama indicate food limita tion." Marine
Biology. 111.437-444.
Smith, P.M., R.I.C.C. Francis, and M. McVeigh. 1991. "Loss
of genetic diversity due to fishing pressure." Fisheries
Research. 10:309-316.
Pain, S. 1990. "Deep-sea fishing dries up the gene pool."
New Scientist. 1 December, p. 31.
Plicansky, D. 1993. "Fishing as a cause of evolution in
fishes." In T.K. Stokes, J.M. McGlade, and R. Law (eds.)
The Exploitation of Evolving Resources. pp. 2- Lecture
Notes in Biomathematics 99. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Sutherland, W.J. 1990. "Evolution and fisheries." Nature.
344:814-815.
Thome-Miller, B. and J. Catena, 1991. The Living Ocean,
Understanding and Protecting Marine Biodiversity.
Island Press, New York.
|
|
 |
|